Search the Archives           Subscribe           About this News Service           Reader Comments


Archived updates for Friday, May 30, 2008

PWC Releases 2008 Patent Litigation Survey

According to PricewaterhouseCoopers' 2008 Patent Litigation Study:
  • The number of patent infringement actions filed has a compound average growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% since 1991.
  • Meanwhile, the number of patents granted has a compound average growth rate (CAGR) of 3.8% since 1991—about two-thirds the growth rate of new case filings of patent infringement.
  • The inflation-adjusted median annual damages award has remained fairly stable over the last 13 years at $3.9 million from 1995 through 2000, and $3.8 million from 2001 through 2007.
  • Jury trial success rates have consistently outperformed their bench counterparts for every year since 1995.
  • Alleged infringers increase their trial success rates slightly as plaintiffs, but have not experienced the same increased success in summary judgments.
  • Recent awards by juries have been running several multiples of the amounts awarded by judges.
  • While jury awards have remained high, bench awards have decreased significantly.
    Patent holders have been successful 37% of the time overall, with a 19% win rate in summary judgments and a 57% win rate at trial.
  • 32% of summary judgments are appealed, with 59% modified or reversed; while 43% of trial decisions are appealed, with 67% modified or reversed.
  • 66% of cases reached trial three years from the date the initial complaint was filed.
    Virginia Eastern and Wisconsin Western districts have the shortest time-to-trial, (.88 and .91 yrs, no data on Georgia).
  • Certain federal district courts (particularly Virginia Eastern, California Central, and Pennsylvania Eastern) continue to be more favorable to patent holders, with shorter time-to-trial, higher success rates, and higher median damages awards.

On Wednesday, a federal jury in the Eastern District of Texas gave a big win to Sam Baxter of McKool Smith, awarding his client, Medtronic, $250 million in a patent infringement case against Boston Scientific. Howrey represented Boston Scientific.
    (2)comment(s)     translate     More Updates     Send    

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^Thanks!!

婚前徵信婚姻感情大陸抓姦外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚工商徵信婚前徵信外遇抓姦感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦離婚家暴工商徵信法律諮詢跟蹤工商徵信婚前徵信感情挽回外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴尋人大陸抓姦離婚大陸抓姦外遇尋人家暴工商徵信法律諮詢家暴感情挽回大陸抓姦外遇婚前徵信離婚尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信大陸抓姦尋人感情挽回外遇抓姦婚前徵信感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦工商徵信法律諮詢離婚家暴工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢離婚感情挽回婚前徵信外遇抓姦家暴尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回">徵大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢

April 06, 2009 11:34 PM  
Blogger LAN said...

puma mens shoes
puma shoes
puma speed
nike shoes
nike air
nike air shoes
nike air max 90
nike air max 95
nike air max tn
nike air rift
nike shox r4
nike air max 360
nike shox nz
puma cat
air max trainers
mens nike air max
sports shoes
nike air rifts
nike air rift trainer
nike air
nike shoes air max
nike shoes shox
air shoes
Lucyliu IS Lucyliu
nike shoe cart
puma future
cheap puma
nike rift
jeans shop
diesel jeans
levis jeans
nike rift shoes
cheap nike air rifts
bape shoes

January 06, 2010 11:25 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home