UKIPO: New Test for Business Method Patentability Produces Same Results
The UK Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in the matters of Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan’s Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 ("Aerotel/Macrossan") (236Kb) proposed a new test for assessing whether inventions such as business methods relate to patentable subject matter.
In ressponse to that decision, the UK Intellectual Property Office ("Office") issued an official practice note on the way patent examiners assess whether inventions are for patentable subject matter. This notice supersedes the following Practice Notices:
In ressponse to that decision, the UK Intellectual Property Office ("Office") issued an official practice note on the way patent examiners assess whether inventions are for patentable subject matter. This notice supersedes the following Practice Notices:
- Patents Act 1977: Examining for Patentability (29 July 2005)
- Handling Patent Applications for Excluded Subject Matter (8 February 2002)
- Patents Act 1977: interpreting section 1(2) (24 April 2002)
- Claims to Programs for computers (19 April 1999)
- Patentability of games (25 November 2005): Paragraph 4 is superseded by the present Notice. The rest of this Notice, which explained the comptroller would no longer rely on the Official Ruling 1926(A), still stands.
- Patent applications relating to methods of doing business (24 November 2004): This said the Office would bring appropriate cases to a hearing at an earlier stage and issue abbreviated decisions. This still stands, and indeed may become even more relevant now that Aerotel/Macrossan has simplified the approach.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home
Creative Commons "Attribution" License
© 2004-2007 William F. Heinze