Search the Archives           Subscribe           About this News Service           Reader Comments


Archived updates for Thursday, September 13, 2007

Level of Skill in the Art of Treating Ear Infections Includes Persons Developing Pharmaceutical Formulations

In Daiichi Sankyo Co., LTD v. Apotex, Inc., et al. (reissued as a precedential opinion on Septmembr 12, 2006), the Federal Circuit looked to the experience of the inventors to hold that prior art publication directed at "a highly, highly subspecialized physician" was with the level of ordinary skill in the art of treating bacterial ear infections by topically administering the antibiotic ofloxacin into the ear:

The ’741 patent is drawn to a method for treating bacterial ear infections by topically administering the antibiotic ofloxacin into the ear. Claim 1 is representative and states "[a] method for treating otopathy which comprises the topical otic administration of an amount of ofloxacin or a salt thereof effective to treat otopathy in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier to the area affected with otopathy." ’741 Patent, col.6 ll.36-39.

. . . The art involved in the ’741 patent is the creation of a compound to treat ear infections without damaging a patient's hearing. The inventors of the ’741 patent were specialists in drug and ear treatments—not general practitioners or pediatricians. At the time of the invention, Inventor Sato was a university
professor specializing in otorhinolaryngology; Inventor Handa was a clinical
development department manager at Daiichi, where he was involved with new drug
development and clinical trials; and Inventor Kitahara was a research scientist at Daiichi engaged in the research and development of antibiotics. Additionally, others working in the same field as the inventors of the ’741 patent were of the same skill level. See Daiichi Material for [C]onference on Development, at 1 (Nov. 11, 1987) (stating that "there are many voices among medical persons concerned with otorhinolaryngology for demanding development of an otic solution making use of [ofloxacin]").

Further, the problem the invention of the ’741 patent was trying to solve was to create a topical antibiotic compound to treat ear infections (otopathy) that did not have damage to the ear as a side effect. ’741 Patent, col.1 ll.23-34. Indeed, most of the written description details the inventors’ testing ofloxacin on guinea pigs and their findings that ototoxicity did not result from the use of their compound. Such animal testing is traditionally outside the realm of a general practitioner or pediatrician. Finally, while a general practitioner or pediatrician could (and would) prescribe the invention of the ’741 patent to treat ear infections, he would not have the training or knowledge to develop the claimed compound absent some specialty training such as that possessed by the ’741 patent’s inventors. Accordingly, the level of ordinary skill in the art of the ’741 patent is that of a person engaged in developing pharmaceutical formulations and treatment methods for the ear or a specialist in ear treatments such as an otologist, otolaryngologist, or otorhinolaryngologist who also has training in pharmaceutical formulations. Thus, the district court clearly erred in finding otherwise.

. . . Daiichi’s expert opined that the Ganz reference disclosed "nothing at all" relevant. This opinion was based on the fact that the article was directed at "a highly, highly subspecialized physician . . . which would be the otologist or the ear doctor" not a primary care physician or general practitioner. Trial Tr. Vol. 7, 72-73 Nov. 11, 2005. He further explained that the article did not render the invention of the ’741 patent obvious "most importantly because those of ordinary skill are defined as a population . . . of physicians that are completely different than the audience Dr. Ganz [the author] was writing to." Id. at 73-74. Thus, Daiichi’s evidence as to why this reference did not render the invention of the ’741 patent obvious was based on an improper determination of the level of skill in the art.

    (5)comment(s)     translate     More Updates     Send    

5 Comments:

Anonymous atlanta ear doctor said...

I really like the content you have written regarding the topic and information given. Thanks for all that I will surly refer this treatment to my friend. There are many expert doctor available in Atlanta that can give you better treatment.

August 05, 2012 3:38 AM  
Blogger Zheng junxai5 said...

zhengjx20160613
louis vuitton handbags
adidas superstar
coach outlet clearance
replica rolex watches
kobe shoes 11
hollister jeans
coach outlet clearance
michael kors outlet clearance
true religion outlet online
ray bans
coach factory outlet online
kobe 10
longchamp handbags
coach outlet online
jordan retro 4
ray ban sunglasses outlet
christian louboutin sale clearance
michael kors bags
coach factory outlet online
tods sale
gucci belts
ray ban sunglasses
cheap jordans
ray ban outlet
louis vuitton handbags
true religion outlet
coach outlet
louis vuitton outlet stores
louis vuitton outlet stores
louis vuitton purses
timberlands
coach factory outlet
retro jordans 13
gucci outlet
michael kors outlet
longchamp le pliage
beats by dr dre
michael kors outlet clearance
fitflop clearance

June 12, 2016 10:42 PM  
Blogger qqqqqq said...

adidas stan smith
cheap nfl jerseys
michael kors uk
yeezy shoes
adidas stan smith shoes
basketball shoes
kobe byrant shoes
cheap jordans
adidas ultra boost
cat boots

January 23, 2018 3:18 AM  
Blogger Fghkfhk Dfgaert said...

nike outlet
polo ralph lauren outlet
yeezy shoes
michael kors uk
converse trainers
prada outlet
falcons jersey
salomon boots

April 09, 2018 4:04 AM  
Blogger Xu千禧 said...

polo ralph lauren outlet
canada goose jackets
christian louboutin shoes
off-white clothing
nike soldes
fitflops sale clearance
nike factory outlet
nike air max
pandora jewelry
moncler jackets

August 09, 2018 8:47 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home