Search the Archives           Subscribe           About this News Service           Reader Comments

Archived updates for Monday, August 07, 2006

UK Relatve Grounds for Refusal Expected to End in October 2007

In February 2006, the UK Trade Marks Registry, published a consultation paper on how to deal with the relative grounds for refusal contained in Section 5 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 ("the Act"). The consultation period ended on 17 May 2006 and the Registry announced on August 2, 2006 that
The next steps will to be to flesh out Option 5 in more detail and to introduce the legislative and administrative changes to bring it to fruition. This will involve further consultation with our users on the procedural rules we intend to
introduce, which will cover the procedures for notifying the applicant of any relevant marks identified in the official search, how long the applicant will have to withdraw or restrict his application before it is published, and the circumstances in which owners of earlier trade marks will be notified of later
conflicting marks. We anticipate that this process and the necessary changes to
the internal systems of the Trade Mark Registry of the Patent Office will take
some time to complete and, therefore, we expect the new regime to come into
force in October 2007.
Under the current U.K trademark regime, if the Registry finds an earlier mark that it considers likely to be confused with the new trade mark, it will "cite" the earlier mark as a reason to refuse registration of the later trade mark. Unless the applicant can persuade the Registry that they have misjudged the likelihood of confusion or can otherwise overcome our objection (for example, by gaining the consent of the owner of the earlier mark), registration is refused on what are known as ‘relative grounds’. The owner of the earlier mark does not have to ask to do this, it is done automatically, whether or not the owner of the earlier mark is concerned about the later trade mark.

The proposed Option 5, (Search and notify applicant and earlier mark's owner) places the onus on the applicant to make an informed decision on whether the application should proceed. The registrar would not raise any objection based on the existence of earlier marks. However, in this option the Registry would also notify the owners of any earlier marks that they have advised the applicant that may be in conflict. This will alert the owners of these marks to the prospective registration of the application and thus allow them to lodge an opposition. Receiving such notifications could be made optional.

"Relative rights are pretty much going to be a thing of the past, except in certain countries like the U.S.," John Olsen, a partner of Field Fisher Waterhouse in London, reportedly told Managing IP on August 7, 2006.
    (0)comment(s)     translate     More Updates     Send