Search the Archives           Subscribe           About this News Service           Reader Comments


Archived updates for Thursday, July 28, 2005

Control and Customer Awareness Critical to Experimental Use Exception



In order for a patent claim to be held invalid under the on-sale bar of 35 USC §102(b), the claimed invention must be (1) the subject of a commercial sale and (2) ready for patenting. In Electromotive Division of General Motors Corp. v. Transportation Systems Division of General Electric Co., et al. (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2005), there was no question as to whether EMD's bearing inventions were "ready for patenting" at the time of the alleged commercial sales. Thus, the relevant inquiry concerned only the first prong of the Pfaff test, and, in particular, "whether the circumstances surrounding a pre-critical date sale objectively show that it was primarily made for experimentation."

The court began by discussing its non-exclusive list of thirteen objective factors relevant to determining whether pre-critical date activities involving the patented invention --either publlic use or sale– were primarily experimental, and therefore not commercial. See Allen Eng’g, 299 F.3d at 1353 (citing EZ Dock, 276 F.3d at 1357 (J. Linn, concurring)). It then went on to "hold not only that customer awareness is among the experimentation factors, but also that it is critical" and to "conclude that control and customer awareness ordinarily must be proven if experimentation is to be found."

In March 1993, EMD approached Union Pacific railroad for permission to substitute its new planetary bearings for prior art bearings in an order for two locomotives that Union Pacific placed earlier in 1992. Union Pacific allegedly agreed. Nevertheless, it did not sign a confidentiality agreement or any other type of a contract consenting to participate in the field program. Union Pacific also was not placed under any restrictions or supervision regarding the use of the locomotives containing new planetary bearings. Nor was Union Pacific given any design details for the new planetary bearings or required to monitor or document its usage of the subject locomotives during the field program. On September 29, 1994, EMD filed a patent application for its new planetary bearings.

The court compared these facts to those in Lough v. Brunswick Corp., 86 F.3d 1113 (Fed. Cir. 1996):
The facts here are closely analogous to those in Lough, where, as noted
above, this court rejected an inventor’s claim that a pre-critical date public
use of his liquid seal assembly invention was made for experimentation. In
Lough, the inventor distributed six prototypes of his liquid seal assembly
invention to his friends for use in their boats. After distribution, the Lough
inventor did not maintain any supervision over his friends’ use of the liquid
seal assemblies or follow-up with them for comments as to the operability of the
liquid seal assemblies. Similarly, EMD allowed Union Pacific unsupervised use of
the new planetary bearings. EMD neither monitored the conditions under which
Union Pacific used the new planetary bearings nor solicited any feedback from
Union Pacific regarding the bearings’ performance. What is more, EMD, like the
inventor in Lough, did not maintain any records of the alleged testing or
require Union Pacific to do so. As we stated in Lough, "Lough’s failure to
monitor the use of his prototypes by his acquaintances, in addition to the lack
of records or reports from those acquaintances concerning the operability of the
devices, compel the conclusion that, as a matter of law, he did not engage in
experimental use." 86 F.3d at 1122. We are equally compelled to conclude as a
matter of law that EMD did not engage in any experimentation on its new
planetary bearings.

Professor Wegner has already commented that "This case is a grand synthesis of the law of experimental use insofar as § 102(b) is concerned. Surely, it will be regarded as a leading case. Electromotive Division takes a hard ball approach that limits the circumstances under which an 'experimental' use will be found."
    (5)comment(s)     translate     More Updates     Send    

5 Comments:

Blogger electronixkit said...

I'm doing a paper about the merchandise liquidation and got this post. Its not whar I was looking for but it is a good artical for my Finance class... Very profesional blog.

September 18, 2006 11:38 AM  
Blogger Zheng junxai5 said...

zhengjx20160613
cheap oakley sunglasses
gucci handbags
lebron james shoes 13
jordan retro 13
cheap oakleys
nike roshe run mens
jordan 6s
air jordan shoes
louis vuitton bags
toms outlet
oakley sunglasses wholesale
christian louboutin outlet
retro 11
cheap oakleys
michael kors outlet clearance
louis vuitton outlet
celine bags
mont blanc pen
true religion sale
adidas outlet store
coach outlet
adidas originals store
louis vuitton handbags
michael kors outlet clearance
cheap jerseys
true religion jeans
louis vuitton bags
kate spade handbags
nike roshe one
timberland outlet
montblanc pen
marc jacobs outlet
michael kors handbags
kate spade outlet
asics running shoes
adidas superstar trainers
nike blazers uk
nike sb dunks
michael kors outlet
nike air max 90

June 12, 2016 9:57 PM  
Blogger chenlina said...

chenlina20160922
toms shoes outlet
louis vuitton outlet
oakley store
tods shoes
mont blanc pens
adidas nmd
gucci outlet
coach factory outlet
gucci outlet
christian louboutin paris

September 22, 2016 4:21 AM  
Blogger raybanoutlet001 said...

coach outlet
mbt shoes outlet
ugg boots
ugg outlet
seahawks jersey
polo ralph lauren
oakley sunglasses
new york knicks jersey
supra sneakers
nike blazer pas cher

July 08, 2017 2:34 AM  
Blogger happy 123 said...

coach outlet
nike huarache
longchamp handbags
ralph lauren
nike factory outlet
oakley sunglasses
ferragamo outlet
ugg boots
fitflops sale
jordan shoes

August 02, 2017 1:33 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home