U.S. Pat. No. D321,347
In Colida v. Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. (Fed. Cir., March 9, 2004, not citeable as precedent), the differences between the â€™347 patent and the CDM-7900 handset wer "so obvious and pronounced that Tony Colidaâ€™s allegation that the CDM-7900 handset infringes his patent and that the district court erred in granting summary judgment is beyond the reasonable contemplation of fair-minded people."