Search the Archives           Subscribe           About this News Service           Reader Comments


Archived updates for Thursday, October 04, 2007

What To Do Now About the USPTO Rule Changes Effective November 1, 2007

Thanks to Peter G. Pappas, Daniel J. Warren, and Chris Chan of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP for the best presentation yet on what to do now about the USPTO Rule Changes taking effect on November 1, 2007. Contact them for their thoughts on these issues from their insightful slides.

In Anticipation of Rules Limiting Continuing Examination Practice

  • File one or more new continuation applications by 11.01.2007:
  1. Where two or more continuing applications have already been filed in an application family
  2. Think ahead and consider whether a CON will be needed to accommodate claims canceled from other cases due to the 5/25 claim rule.
  3. May serve as vehicle for continuing examination where no RCE available
  • File RCE before 11.01.2007 in applications RCE has already been filed in any case in the application family
  • Review related cases to identify information to file in IDS by 11.01.2007 when an RCE may not be available for late submission of prior art.
  • Review C-I-P applications and identify claims that are supported by a parent application and submit statement to PTO or drop priority claim

Actions in Anticipation of Rules Limiting the Number of Claims

  • No action required if already received first action on the merits (FAOM)
  • No action required if 25 or fewer total claims and 5 or fewer independent claims pending (Must consider, however, whether other pending applications contain patentably indistinct claims that will be included in counting of the claims.)
  • Where first examination will occur after November 1, 2007, and the application contains more than 5 independent claims or 25 total claims:
  1. File Preliminary Amendment to cancel claims to get to 5/25 claims
  2. Request refund of excess claims fees previously paid
  3. File Suggested Restriction Requirement with election to 5/25 claims
  4. File Examination Support Document (typically not recommended)

Actions in Anticipation of Rules on Patentably Indistinct Claims:

  • Identify cases in which an “Identification Statement” must be filed.
  • File Identification Statement (before February 1, 2008 for currently pending applications) where
  1. Filing date within 2 months
  2. A common inventor, and
  3. Owned by same person
  • Identify cases in which “Rebuttable Presumption” of patentably indistinct claims must be addressed.
  • File a terminal disclaimer or rebuttal where
  1. Filing date is same day
  2. A common inventor
  3. Owned by same person, and
  4. Substantially overlapping disclosure
  • Consider that even with a terminal disclaimer, the Examiner may require applicant to cancel patentably indistinct claims from all but one application.

Checklist of Primary Recommended Actions in Pending Applications:

  • Expedite IDS submissions, RCE filings before 11.01.2007
  • Consider filing additional continuation applications before 11.01.2007 e.g., to claim unclaimed subject matter
  • Determine whether preliminary amendments are needed to comply with 5/25 claim limitation or to cancel patentably indistinct claims from all but one application
  • Determine whether a suggested restriction requirement should be filed
  • Determine whether an Identification Statement must be filed
  • Determine whether a filing is needed to rebut a presumption of patentably indistinct claims
    (1)comment(s)     translate     More Updates     Send    

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^Thanks!!

婚前徵信婚姻感情大陸抓姦外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚工商徵信婚前徵信外遇抓姦感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦離婚家暴工商徵信法律諮詢跟蹤工商徵信婚前徵信感情挽回外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴尋人大陸抓姦離婚大陸抓姦外遇尋人家暴工商徵信法律諮詢家暴感情挽回大陸抓姦外遇婚前徵信離婚尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信大陸抓姦尋人感情挽回外遇抓姦婚前徵信感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦工商徵信法律諮詢離婚家暴工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢離婚感情挽回婚前徵信外遇抓姦家暴尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回">徵大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢

April 07, 2009 1:22 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home