Search the Archives           Subscribe           About this News Service           Reader Comments


Archived updates for Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Copyright Recapture Battles Loom


According to Pamela A. MacLean writing for the National Law Journal on April 3, 2006, a copyright time bomb that has been quietly ticking away for nearly 30 years may soon explode into a flood of intellectual property litigation as authors begin to recapture their transferred copyrights.

To protect authors of older works from having to suffer with bad deals they entered into when they had little negotiating skill or leverage, Section 304(c) of the Copyright Act allows copyright owners (and their heirs) to terminate all grants, licenses or transfers of rights made prior to 1978 beginning on the 56th year after an assignment was made. As noted by Lloyd J. Jassin in Copyright Termination: How Authors (and Their Heirs) Can Recapture Their Pre-1978 Copyrights, "This allows authors to benefit from laws that extended the term of copyright from 56 years to 95 years."

[He also notes that post-1977 grants may be terminated during a five year period beginning 35 years after the grant was made. However, the 35- year rule only applies to grants made by the author after January 1, 1978. Consequently, the author’s surviving spouse or children may terminate assignments executed after January 1, 1978 only if the assignment was made by the now dead author.]

But "the devil is in the details," writes Jassen. "Any copyright proprietor wishing to terminate a grant, license or transfer of any copyright rights must provide at least two (2) years’ and no more than ten (10) years’ written notice to the person to whom the grant was made." That notice must also be filed with the U.S. Copyright Office.

In 2003, authors began entering that 10-year notice window for rights that will be recaptured in 2013. Ever since, publishers have been trying to avoid recapture losses by characterizing agreements with authors as "works for hire" where the publisher owns the original copyright. However, only certain types of works can qualify, and in the reported words of Kyle Staggs, director of legal affairs for Bug Music in Los Angeles, "If I am a record label, I am not going to let anyone think I don't have 100% control of my sound recordings."
    (2)comment(s)     translate     More Updates     Send    

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^Thanks!!

婚前徵信婚姻感情大陸抓姦外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚工商徵信婚前徵信外遇抓姦感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦離婚家暴工商徵信法律諮詢跟蹤工商徵信婚前徵信感情挽回外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴尋人大陸抓姦離婚大陸抓姦外遇尋人家暴工商徵信法律諮詢家暴感情挽回大陸抓姦外遇婚前徵信離婚尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信大陸抓姦尋人感情挽回外遇抓姦婚前徵信感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦工商徵信法律諮詢離婚家暴工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢離婚感情挽回婚前徵信外遇抓姦家暴尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回">徵大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢

April 07, 2009 3:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

^^Thanks!!

婚前徵信婚姻感情大陸抓姦外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚工商徵信婚前徵信外遇抓姦感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦離婚家暴工商徵信法律諮詢跟蹤工商徵信婚前徵信感情挽回外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴尋人大陸抓姦離婚大陸抓姦外遇尋人家暴工商徵信法律諮詢家暴感情挽回大陸抓姦外遇婚前徵信離婚尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信大陸抓姦尋人感情挽回外遇抓姦婚前徵信感情挽回尋人大陸抓姦工商徵信法律諮詢離婚家暴工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢離婚感情挽回婚前徵信外遇抓姦家暴尋人工商徵信外遇抓姦法律諮詢家暴婚前徵信尋人感情挽回">徵大陸抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回法律諮詢

April 07, 2009 3:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home